Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Hartwell Dowling



Hartwell Dowling
Coordinator of Specialty Dockets and Grants
State of Maine Judicial Branch

         In his first job just out of Boston University with a master’s degree in social work, Hartwell Dowling, while doing both juveniles and adults clinical work in  two Maine state prisons, discovered very quickly that there was a very high rate of substance abuse.

          “People there [in prison] had drug abuse problems, and there wasn’t much help there for them,” Dowling remembers. In a subsequent position, in a Maine family court, he learned about the drug court model, “and it resonated with me. The outcomes were so much superior to what I saw in the business-as-usual setting.”

          Even with those encouraging results, Dowling, who now holds the title of coordinator of Specialty Dockets and Grants soon learned that funding for drug courts would be hard to come by in Maine where resources for the judicial system have been lacking.

          Another challenge has been the labor-intensive quality of drug cases, Dowling reports, noting that judges do not always have the time needed to devote to those cases. Compounding the problem is the small number of judges, relative to a geographical area as large as Maine’s.

          And as in other rural states in New England, a lack of adequate transportation has posed a challenge. “It’s hard to get people to [drug] court and to treatment,” he says.

          Nonetheless, the challenges are being met, with the result that Maine’s drug courts are “very well researched” and the outcomes “demonstrably good,” Dowling says. The federal mandate for medication-assisted treatment has also been of great assistance, he adds, with “the federal government putting its money where its mouth is.”

          More recently, the openness with which opioid addiction is being discussed – by public officials and private citizens – is, as Dowling says, “raising the profile of the issue and putting resources into the reduction of supply and demand.”
         
          Still, much work remains for leaders in the field of drug courts, including improving the infrastructure around drug courts by way of enabling legislation. “That would institutionalize drug courts,” Dowling says, “rather than have them be boutique programs off in the margins.” And the continued involvement of the drug court judges will be a boon. “Some of the judges where we have drug courts have been very dynamic in the community,” says Dowling.

          So has Dowling, judging from his accomplishments to date.

Update:
Hartwell Dowling left his job last month for another job in a drug court system in the southwest. This blog interview is a tribute to Hartwell (written a few months before he left). The NEADCP Board will miss him as will his other colleagues in New England.

Stephanie A. Clark, Esq.,



Stephanie A. Clark, Esq.,
Coordinator Windsor County DUI Treatment Docket

          As an attorney with experience as a court magistrate, Stephanie Clark is no stranger to the ways of local judiciaries, including the Windsor County Superior Court in White River Junction, Vt., where she is serving as coordinator of the county’s DUI Treatment Docket.
          Clark found her way to that destination, partly by the pull of New England where she attended law school (in Springfield, Mass.) but more because of the evidence demonstrating the value of stand-alone courts serving people with addictions.
          “The more I learn and am exposed to all the models,” such as the stand-alone DUI unit she  coordinates in Vermont, “the more I see the increased public safety while costs are being reduced and lives are being saved ,” Clark says. “I’m so impressed with the work being done.”
          Still, Clark believes much work remains, in Vermont and elsewhere in the region, and she singles out several areas where attention must be paid:
·       Education – “All the stakeholders really need to understand the differences in the [stand-alone] models of problem solving courts and how they operate,” she says.
·       Resources – The lack of financial and other forms of public support is “the biggest challenge” for drug court professionals, especially in states where fiscal deficits loom large.
·       Public perception – The stigma of addiction persists, and it places “so much pressure” on those struggling with addictions, she says, noting that establishment of a community advisory committee is in the works for the DUI docket “to grow a broader support system for people in recovery in our community.”
As for the requirement that drug courts receiving federal funds must comply with Medication Assisted Treatment, Clark reports that MAT is available and being used in Vermont when it is believed appropriate for use by individual drug court clients. “It’s an important piece in their stability and recovery,” she says. But, she adds, there are not enough providers of the treatment and “the wait lists are so long.”
Even with the challenges facing drug courts, Clark remains optimistic that drug court professionals working in all manner of problem solving courts will be able to sustain them, expand them, and bring them into in line with national standards – all in keeping with the motto for NEADCP’s upcoming conference: “Where Justice and Treatment Meet: The New Standard for  Excellence.”